A field guide to agapé, eros, and other loves
Love comes in several flavors. Knowing that there are more types of love to cultivate means we can reframe more relationships as types of love — and therefore experience love more often.
This book maps those perspectives. It is a field guide, not a manual. Take what resonates; build your own model if you prefer. The ocean doesn't mind.
Chapter One
To start with, I define all types of love as the cooperative overlapping of perspectives — when you and I share we-identity. Not exactly that two become one; more like we retain our individual identities while simultaneously tapping into a shared perspective.
If we became fully one, we would no longer be individuals who could co-relate. If we remained purely as individuals, there would be no transcendent experience of union.
Matter as we experience it is an illusory construct, with great utility. But in reality, there are no things — the universe is a singular verb which refracts with internal verb relationships. It is this inter-relationality of verbs which produces the appearance of nouns.
Love is what happens when two apparent nouns remember they are verbs.
To come back down to earth: I like to map the types of love onto the image of a sailboat. This is just a model, so take it with a little salt, or build your own if you prefer. Conveniently, this sailboat image resonates rather well with the psychological model OCEAN — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism. A map of the psyche that happens to share its name with the sea.
The Model
A sailboat of a certain size has a certain momentum. If we want more momentum, more attraction — we're going to need a bigger boat. Here are the parts of ours.
Chapter Five
If we imagine the three types of love as the RGB primary colours of light, then their sum is white. When we activate this blend of all three — parental, fraternal, erotic — the resultant full spectrum has the strength to take us beyond ourselves.
Agapé is an unfocused full-spectrum love. Love without an object. Love for its own sake, without the need for reciprocity. Psychologically this maps with enthusiasm — en theos, in spirit, radiant, non-localized.
Amoré is focused full-spectrum love. A rich, intense beam of affection, usually focused on a life partner — though sometimes on a religious, heroic, or aspirational figure. Amoré maps with assertion: we project and assert our love toward its object.
Agapé is an unstructured, unfocused love — or you could say its focus is the entire universe. When agapé is in full bloom, the heart chakra is wide open, and like a spinnaker it powerfully drags the rest of you along behind it like a ragdoll.
Ecstatic love revivifies the appearance of locality — from static to ex-stasis; from noun to verb; matter to spirit. Agapé is the experience of balanced flow between beatific pressure and ecstatic release, between potential and manifestation, between source and Gaia.
Chapter Seven
I call a certain type of person Brighteyes — their inner light makes it easy to cross the self-other barrier and swim in their depths. Occasionally, when I encounter a Brighteyes who is fully standing in their power, I call them Clearheart. This is the person who is energetically exuberant, spiritually overabundant, habitually in a state of hyper-neuroplasticity.
Usually it takes a lot of inner work to reach this condition. It is necessary to radically clean out the supply-side valve — the heart chakra — and intelligently modulate the demand side.
The first time I met my favorite postal worker, we immediately fell into resonance at first sight. At each encounter, we glow with instinctive affection and spontaneous joy. When she's on the sorting floor, she'll pop out front with a grin, saying "I heard your voice." It reminds me of a little prayer.
Our energy is complex. There is a base of innocent puppy infatuation, but floating just below the surface is a smouldering layer of erotic potential. We finish each other's sentences when one of us can't find a word. Our conversations circumvent the zero-sum problem.
In game theory, zero-sum refers to games where for each point won by one player, there is a corresponding loss by the other — arm wrestling, war. People commonly treat social interactions this way. But conversations don't have to be zero-sum. All you have to do is play for the good of the game instead of for yourself. Now when either of us makes a point, it credits both our fun ledgers, and the game's. Win-win-win.
And so we flirt for our co-amusement. Because it is a shared game, we both win. Because we both evolve in our interaction, the game also evolves.
Sometimes it is even easier to find agapé, and collaborative equilibrium with others, when we find the right erotic and energetic match. Now we use each other as an excuse to incandesce. We relax into union-at-a-distance, and our energies become covalent.
Covalent means that two atoms are sharing an electron back and forth between their valences — each wins an electron point, plus both win by the creation of a new shared identity. A softened self-other dichotomy, replaced by a non-dual co-identity. Again, win-win-win.